Talossan Time (TST) | Cezembre Time (CZT)

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

FreeDemsCon: Speech by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h

Today, at the Second Annual Convention of Free Democrats, Fiôvân Senator Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h has delivered the first official speech of the event:


Azul, all!

The continued existence of the Kingdom of Talossa is a miracle. How many times it should have died, but was saved from the brink by sheer tenacity - a trait in Ben Madison's very fibre and being which rubbed off on enough people around him to have kept things going in the eleven years (has it been that long?) since he and Amy absconded. 

As for where the FreeDems should 'go' or how they should 'be', I think one direction we can mostly agree on is the supplanting of the 1997 Organic Law in favor of a new constitution. Almost all of the pre-2004 legal rulings on same are gone, and the document itself has been amended so many times as to make it (save for the Rights and Covenants plus a few other things) so unrecognizable from what it was when first enacted almost twenty years ago.

To put it another way, the OrgLaw tries too hard to be a book of by-laws as well as a document establishing a playing field for legality, as I think the constitution of Texas tries to do. Certainly there are laws the changing of which should be treated with kid-gloves, but a novel approach to resolving this issue presents itself.

Have a Constitution. Make it bare-bones. Make it as bare-bones as possible. Then have a set of what I would call 'Great Laws' apart from the Constitution that would be changed/amended in the same way the Constitution itself would be. I would even put into the Great Laws the way we handle our Head of State. In this way, we don't need to tinker with the Constitution when/if the monarchy is dissolved.

The one thing I would have the constitution itself do in very specific terms is the enumeration of rights. I would take time to run through the current Rights and Covenants and figure out what rights are codified and think of anything else that might have been left out. I would look to the constitution of the Republic of Talossa for help, here (as much as Woolley would loathe that, I know).

I would put into the Great Laws the way in which we do the Ziu, Head of State, and the courts. Minor immigration things and other matters can be put into regular statue law. 

With this, we have three categories of Talossan law: the supreme law of the land (Constitution); those laws that will be changed often, but should be done so in the same way the Constitution itself is changed (Great Laws); and all other laws (regular statute law, provincial law, etc.).

A new constitution and the dissolution of the monarchy can and should be seen as two separate questions, and I encourage this Convention and the post-Convention FreeDems to look into all this further.

I should think a Constitutional Convention would take one to two years with the goal of having a document that could last for at least two decades. Talossa has with seismic historical happenings accompanied same with new constitutions. In the light of the Split, Ben-going-bye-bye, and Reunision, let's continue this tradition.

One other thing: on 26 December, the Royal Archives will release the first installment of the Archivist Quarterly. Watch for it!

It was also revealed that other orators at the Convention will include FreeDem member Viteu Marcianüs, editor of ETT Inxheneu Crova and Lüc da Schir, O.Be. of ModRads.


No comments:

Post a Comment